The saga continues with Doug Baker’s resignation

Rants and Raves of Mac McIntyre

The resignation of NIU President Doug Baker is yet another setback for the university. Enrollment is on a steady decline and while some attribution can go to high tuition fees arising from its dependency on shaky (at best) state funding NIU suffers most from its word-of-mouth advertising. That word is and has been poor administration and challenged security on and off campus.

Baker’s dismal performance to deliver on his promise of a new era of ethical leadership further extends NIU’s failure to control its narrative. Word-of-mouth is the most effective form of advertising regardless of who controls that narrative. Those considering the substantial investment required to attend a four-year college may not be invigorated by the news that NIU awaits its next new genius.

News that an investigation conducted by the Governor’s Office of Executive Inspector General found that Baker’s administration routinely skirted ethics requirements to hire highly compensated consultants with lavish perks is not politically correct. Especially not in a state facing the worst junk bond ratings status in the nation. It’s not PC to taxpayers choosing between already the highest tax burden in the nation and the greener pastures of Wisconsin, Indiana, Kentucky, Missouri, and Iowa. Most of those states mentioned offer lower costs as an incentive for Illinois students to attend their universities.

The Baker administration contributed to the continuing saga at NIU instead of its progress. It doesn’t matter if his mistakes were with all good intentions or if any accomplishments prove great in merit over time. The public perception remains there is something seriously wrong at NIU and nothing has been done to fix it.

When Baker steps down June 30 he will receive a severance package of $687,000 and another up to $30,000 for “reasonable, unpaid expenses for legal counsel.” That narrative lumps NIU with a system that has led to the state’s junk-bond status for taking too good of care of its top dogs and their buddies versus paying its bills.

Remember it was “The Coffee Fund” narrative when Doug Baker was hired at NIU. Employees were allegedly selling scrap materials from university property for a slush fund for private parties and perks. FBI vans were loaded up with records obtained from raids on various administrative offices. This was the background he was brought into.

Fix it he did not. He was the ultimate outsider from as far away as the states of Washington and Idaho. He was brought in to clean up the mess. Unfortunately, it looks like he was immediately swallowed by the culture of pay to play in Illinois. In other words, if you can’t beat ’em, join ’em.


  1. Part of the problem is no one pays attention to who goes on the Board of Directors. They’re supposed to be the watchdogs for the university. Too many people assume (and you know what the first 3 letters spell) university presidents are upstanding, honest, learned folks. Wrong. Too many of them are opportunists who have clawed their way to the top by being manipulative scheming people who would sell their mothers for power. They are cunning and deceptive. No wonder our tuitions are so outrageously high and our school is in junk bond status. Shameful and embarrassing for us alums.

  2. I’m totally disgusted as a taxpayer that they paid him off. That money should have gone back to the university and the employees that have not had a raise in years. They lose enrollment yet we don’t hear them letting professors go, instead he hires these part timers in and cheats on paying them. I certainly hope they don’t spend more searching for someone new to rip us off. If I were an alumnus of NIU there is no way I would donate a penny to them. Who’s on the board that votes to pay him? Maybe more questions need to be asked!!!!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.